By: Dawn M. Lurie, Matthew Isaac, and John W. Mazzeo

This blog post was first published as an alert.

For many California employers, immigration enforcement no longer appears as a dramatic but rare worksite event. Recent enforcement activity has required employers to shift from a reactive posture

Continue Reading California Compliance Refresher: Immigration Enforcement Without the Missteps or Miscalculations

By: Dawn M. Lurie, John W. Mazzeo, and Selene Malench*

On May 29, 2026, DHS extended Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Lebanon through November 27, 2026, continuing employment authorization for eligible beneficiaries.

The decision has been formally published in the May 29, 2026 edition of the Federal Register available at here. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has updated the “Alert” section on the TPS country webpage as well.

Continue Reading Temporary Relief: DHS Extends Lebanon TPS: Key Employer Actions

By: Dawn M. Lurie, John W. Mazzeo, Leon Rodriguez, and Mia Batista

This significant development may have wide-ranging impacts, as Adjustment of Status is a pathway available to family, employment-based, and investment-based (EB-5) immigrants and organizations.

On Friday, May 22, US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued a Policy Memorandum (Memorandum) that could meaningfully affect how Adjustment of Status applications (Adjustment) are adjudicated moving forward, though USCIS implementation details remain limited and operational impacts are still developing. While the Memorandum does not change the statutory eligibility requirements for Adjustment under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA or Act), it signals a potentially significant shift in how immigration officers may exercise discretion when adjudicating Adjustment applications. The Memorandum emphasizes that Adjustment is an “extraordinary act of administrative grace” because it exempts the foreign national from having to exit the United States to complete green card processing and should only be exercised sparingly.

Continue Reading Adjustment Ambiguity: What Employers Should Know About USCIS’s New Policy Direction

By: Dawn M. Lurie and Selene Malench*

On May 15, USCIS updated its guidance related to Somalia noting: “When completing the Expiration Date (if any) fields on Form I-9, input ‘as per court order’ in Section 1 and ‘July 1, 2026,’ in Section 2 along with a note

Continue Reading Quick Alert: Somalia’s TPS End Date Extended

By: Dawn M. LurieAlexander J. Madrak, and Selene Malench*

This blog post was first published as an alert.

A fast-moving clash between federal regulators, state motor vehicle agencies, and the courts is reshaping who can legally hold and keep a non-domiciled commercial driver’s license (“CDL”). As

Continue Reading Commercial Driver’s License Compliance Clash: Court Rulings, State Crackdowns, and Federal Enforcement

By: Dawn M. LurieAlexander J. Madrak, and Selene Malench*

Updates at a Glance:

  • Temporary Protected Status (TPS) El Salvador: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has updated its TPS El Salvador website to automatically extend work authorization for Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) with a facial expiration date of March 9, 2025 to July 22, 2026
  • TPS Yemen (Litigation Update):  On May 1, a federal judge temporarily blocked the Department of Homeland Security from terminating TPS for Yemeni beneficiaries, pausing the May 4 termination.  USCIS has updated its TPS Yemen website noting the EADs issued under the TPS designation of Yemen with an original expiration date of March 3, 2023, September 3, 2024, and March 3, 2026 is extended per court order.
  • Form I-9 and E-Verify: E-Verify has issued updated placeholder expiration dates, including Yemen, for several TPS countries affected by litigation stays, which employers should use when completing Forms I-9 and running E-Verify cases.
  • TPS Supreme Court Update: On April 29, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the challenges to DHS’s terminations of TPS for Syria and Haiti. The Court appeared divided on both the threshold question of whether courts have authority to review TPS terminations and the merits of the beneficiaries’ claims. A decision in favor of the government would allow the terminations to take effect immediately. A ruling is expected before the end of the term.
Continue Reading Another Week, Another Date: Navigating TPS EAD Extensions, Court Stays, and the I-9 Compliance Tightrope

This week, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) sent email alerts and added guidance on the E‑Verify What’s New area on their website establishing dates for Form I‑9 Section 2 (and related Section 1 notations) for Temporary Protected Status (TPS) countries with terminations stayed by litigation. As discussed in our

Continue Reading TPS in the Waiting Room: Courts Continue to Review, Form I-9 Placeholder Dates Appear

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued updated guidance late this afternoon, March 13, 2026, revising Form I-9 instructions for Haitian TPS beneficiaries. This update supersedes the February 14, 2026 notice and follows the federal court order in Miot et al. v. Trump, which stayed DHS’s planned termination

Continue Reading Another Friday, Another Fire Drill: USCIS Releases Late Day Update on Haiti TPS

By: Dawn M. Lurie, Selene Malench*, and Alexander Madrak

On March 3, 2026, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published a notice in the Federal Register confirming the termination of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Yemen. The termination will take effect 60 days after publication in May and will

Continue Reading DHS Ends TPS Yemen: Another Termination for Employers to Track

This blog post was first published as an alert.

On February 6, 2026, the administration sought emergency relief from the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia’s February 2 order (see here for our prior TPS employer impact update) and filed an appeal with the U.S. Court of

Continue Reading Ask Not for Whom the Bell Tolls: Haiti TPS Litigation and USCIS I-9 Guidance Signal Broader Employer Risk-and Unanswered Questions